01
Clinical Outcomes
Open detailed clinical outcome results and supporting figures.
View Results ↗
Systematic Review · Meta-Analysis · Reference Library
Less Invasive, Equally Effective?
Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional CABG in Multivessel Coronary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
1Nunukan Regional General Hospital, Nunukan; Yarsi University, Jakarta, Indonesia ·
2Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia ·
3Division of Thoracic, Cardiac, and Vascular Surgery, Abdul Wahab Sjahranie Regional General Hospital, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia
Reference and supplementary-material portal for the scientific poster.
Review at a Glance
A compact landing page intended to be opened from the QR code on the e-poster.
PopulationAdults with multivessel or complex coronary artery disease.
ComparisonMinimally invasive CABG versus conventional CABG via sternotomy.
OutcomesMortality, MACCE, MI, stroke, AF, TVR, graft patency, ICU LOS, and hospital LOS.
Full Reference Library
The complete bibliography used in this systematic review and meta-analysis is available through the link below.
Results by Outcome
Detailed figures, analyses, and supplementary result files are grouped by outcome category.
02
Perioperative Outcomes
Open detailed perioperative outcome results and supporting figures.
View Results ↗03
Surgical Outcomes
Open detailed surgical outcome results and supporting figures.
View Results ↗Supplementary Materials
Supporting files for the systematic review and meta-analysis.
P
PRISMA Flow Diagram
Identification, screening, eligibility, and included studies.
View PDF ↗B
Risk of Bias
Complete risk-of-bias assessment for the included studies.
View PDF ↗T
Study Characteristics
Detailed characteristics of included studies.
Coming soonSuggested Citation
Al Faisal MA, Shaafaat AN, Joalsen I. Less Invasive, Equally Effective? Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional CABG in Multivessel Coronary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.